Monthly Archives: September 2011

Creativity Tweets of the Week — 9/30/11

Before we dive into a few of the best links I tweeted this week, let me thank Stan Stewart (@muz4now) for naming me a “One Lovely Blog” recipient. That was lovely of you, Stan! In order to accept it I have to do some homework, however; share seven random things about myself and name fifteen other good blogs. Hmm. As for the latter, I’d be hard-pressed to choose only fifteen. As for the former, there aren’t seven things worth sharing.

FYI, did you know that Mr. Bacon has a traveling jones? You’ve seen him on this site exploring central Virginia, the National Mall, and a presidential bill-signing ceremony. My blogger friend Melissa Crytzer Fry caught him exploring her ranch in Arizona. You can’t keep a good bacon strip down.


Guest Post: Mr. Bacon Goes to the National Book Festival

Many of my readers have been demanding that Mr. Bacon have his own blog. If I were to allow him to do that I’d have few readers left, so instead I’ve allowed Mr. Bacon to write a guest post. Enjoy.

I don't see what the big deal is about writing a book. If it wasn't for these tiny fingers I'd have written dozens by now.

I time-traveled yesterday. The Washington, D.C., Metro system transported me to the National Mall and a scene right out of the 19th Century — a world filled with people who enjoy an antiquated source of amusement called a “book.”

Leave it to a bunch of librarians, in this case the U.S. Library of Congress, to organize something called the National Book Festival. This annual event features authors reading from and signing odd assortments of paper covered in ink and bound by glue.

I wanted to tell the thousands of attendees roaming from tent to tent that they need to join the 21st Century. If you want to be entertained, watch a video of a kitten stuck in a tissue box. If you want to learn something, your Twitter feed will tell you everything you need to know in 140 characters or less.

Bibliophilus Americanis is a strange species. Squirrles gather nuts but these creatures were gathering books. I think I'd rather eat an acorn.

Not surprisingly, the authors of these “books” had a different perspective. Adam Goodheart is a New York Times journalist and author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. It’s a New York Times bestseller. (Does no one else see the irony of the dead technology of newspapers tracking the sale of the dead technology of books?) In writing his book, Goodheart chose not to spend hours every day watching viral videos. Instead he spent his days in the Library of Congress Reading Room, perusing letters and journals written by 19th Century Americans. That experience obviously did something terrible to his brain, because he had this to say about the poetic style of writing he encountered:

These people read Byron, the King James Bible. Their brains hadn’t been infected by this pop-culture styrofoam. I don’t think the tweets of today will carry the same weight.

Note how this creature, like a kangaroo and her pouch, has an additional appendage for toting the books he gathers.

That’s the kind of perspective I’d expect from someone who needed 460 pages to tell a story. I was able to write this entire post in fewer than 1,000 words, Mr. Author Man.

If I can give Goodheart one prop, it’s his sharing of a very wise quote by some dead author named Arthur Koestler. I like the quote both because it’s true and because it’s less than 140 characters:

To want to meet an author because you like his books is as ridiculous as wanting to meet the goose because you like pate de foie gras.

Like Goodheart, Joel Achenbach is confused. He also writes books and is a newspaper reporter for The Washington Post. But he should know better, because he’s been blogging since 1999. Anyhow, here’s how old-fashioned Achenbach is. When he wanted to learn more about deep-sea oil drilling while writing the book A Hole at the Bottom of the Sea: The Race to Kill the BP Oil Gusher, he said he actually went to the library (!) and checked out a 1,000 page book (!) on the subject. He’d start each day with a cup of coffee and the book, apparently forgetting that we’re supposed to start our day by catching up with our Facebook feed.

Is it just me, or does bestelling author and Washington Post reporter Joel Achenbach want to eat me?

While researching the book, Achenbach also read thousands of emails written by government officials and scientists. I’ll give him credit for at least reading written works produced in digital form, although I bet he printed them out.

Achenbach made note of the fact that the organizers had him speaking in a large tent, and compared it to another American tradition also found mostly in the past, a revival. Then he showed his true colors. “Let me tell you about newspapers!” he called out in his best preacher voice. “Books!” The audience ate it up, but of course they suffer from the same disease he does, printophilia.

I am offended. Everyone knows B is for Bacon.

At first I took comfort in the type of attendees I saw there. Thinning gray hair. Crumpled spines. Liver spots. Heck, a lot of these folks probably remember 1861. But then I saw others. Thirty-somethings. Twenty-somethings. Young parents with children. And not one kid was screaming bloody murder, demanding to be returned immediately to his X-Box. Wait, what?

Some parts of our culture never truly die. We’ve had automobiles for a century now, but somebody, somewhere, still manufactures buggy whips. But do you own a buggy whip? I sure don’t. I want to live in a world free of any narrative that takes me longer to read than it does for my Netflix stream to buffer. But I’ll never see that world if we produce a new generation of “readers.”

More than 200 people had queued for David McCullough's book signing an hour before he arrived. If the Pulitzer winner's next biography profiled me, the National Mall wouldn't be big enough for the queue.

Americans love to blame Washington, D.C., for every national ailment. And they’re almost always right to do so. But I learned during my time travel today that the real obstacle to our ideal future is not the collection of crooks we find in the U.S. Capitol, but a more shadowy and sinister cabal in the building across the street — the Library of Congress.

Heck with the “tea party.” We need a “book party.” When this eureka moment struck me, I approached a young woman wearing a blue “National Book Festival” T-shirt. She was attractive, so much so that she should have been home sleeping off last night’s clubbing, not volunteering at an information tent and handing out free (!) water. I told her we need a revolution. We need a “book party.” She smiled and said, “But we already have one. This is it!”


A Thank-You and an Apology

So where are my Creativity Tweets of the Week, you ask? It’s a Friday tradition, right? Where are more pictures of that rapscallion Mr. Bacon?

So I guess I’m starting with the apology. I am in a deep creative groove at the moment. I’m working feverishly on rewriting a personal essay I thought I had put aside for good. So no compilation of the best links I’ve tweeted this week because I haven’t had time to send that many.

But here’s where the thank-you comes in. They’re for the encouragement and commiseration I received in the comments of my last post, “Do You Suffer from ‘Not-Quite’ Paralysis?” A direct result of those conversations was a desire to dust off this essay and get it into shape. And I also learned how to channel my need for deadlines, which I confessed to in that post. I’ve tracked down a contest with a deadline of Monday.

Ack!

So that is my apology and my thank-you. We’ll talk further, once I finish riding this creative wave and submit this essay. In a recent Creativity Tweets of the Week round-up, I shared links on the common theme of balancing writing and social media. This post is an example of the balance I’m striking today.


Do You Suffer from “Not-Quite” Paralysis?

As a journalist I don’t have the luxury of endless rounds of revisions. When the story is due, I file. The same is true when each packet is due for my MFA in Writing program.

No deadline? I keep editing, revising, tweaking. Unlike some of the artists I interviewed on my cr0ss-country U.S. road trip, I suffer from the paralysis of “Not Quite.”

I can get a little obsessive. Last Halloween, the wife and kids quickly finished their jack-o-lanters, then went inside to have pumpkin pie by the fire. I stayed outside in the cold, fussing with Italy's boot.

Two examples:

  1. Way back in February I wrote a personal essay in a local writing class. The instructor liked it so much she continued working with me on it after the 8-week class was over. I received further advice and encouragement on the essay from a graduate instructor at my  MFA residency. It is now September. I’ve submitted it to a grand total of two journals. In both cases the editors wrote personal notes saying they liked it, it didn’t quite work, but be sure to send it elsewhere. I’m still sitting on it.
  2. Last month a talented writer, Jessica McCann, alerted me to an essay contest she thought was perfect for me. The deadline was two days away. I did my best and fired off a short essay. Was the work everything I wanted it to be? Absolutely not. I just learned yesterday that I won first place in that contest, and it will be published online soon.

This paralysis of “Not Quite” can be linked to perfectionism, a demon I know many writers live with every day. But novelist Brenna Lyons, my interview subject in Haverhill, Massachusetts, has overcome the “Not Quite” paralysis. When I asked how she had authored so many books, she shared her secret: “Never leave a manuscript lying around. If you’ve got something completed, for mercy’s sake get it in front of an editor or publisher.”

Entreaties to The Great Pumpkin couldn't change the fact that my design left the pumpkin structurally weakened. After 24 hours it collapsed, like a prop in a cheesy 1950's alien-attack movie.

Now the key word there is “completed.” Somehow Brenna has taught herself how to make that declaration. I haven’t. But it is a statement of fact that one can’t be published if publishers don’t see one’s works.

Every week I write a to-do list. As the week progresses I cross items off the list. It’s pretty obvious when I don’t complete a task; not only does it stand out surrounded by crossed-out entries, I then have to copy it over to the new week’s list. For months now I’ve been re-writing the line “Submit personal essay.”

Perhaps the problem is fear of rejection. But an author I interviewed in Ann Arbor, Michigan, Lillian Cauldwell, has no fear: “I learned a long time ago, the only thing someone can do is slam the door in your face, throw the phone down on the hook, or tell you to drop dead twice.”

Absent a deadline, how do you fight that “Not Quite” paralysis and declare a creative work complete and ready to submit?

UPDATE 09/20/11: Oh my. After writing a draft of this post I forced myself to submit the personal essay mentioned in #1 above to a few literary journals I found on NewPages. I just heard back from one of them, Barely South Review, They’ve asked to publish the work in a volume coming out in 2012. If that isn’t a lesson on the importance of submitting your work, I don’t know what is!

UPDATE 09/21/11: Oh my again. This conversation has prompted me to get off my butt and finish up a personal essay I started two months ago and put aside. To help spur me, I found a deadline to meet, a journal contest that needs entries no later than Monday. Apologies if I become a bit quiet on Twitter and Facebook the next few days…


Creativity Tweets of the Week — 9/16/11

Mr. Bacon accompanied me this morning when I covered President Obama at a bill signing ceremony for one of my freelance clients. The bugger kept inserting himself into every photo I took. Fortunately the many Secret Service agents present did not consider this bendable children’s toy a threat. Not sure how he’d hold up in Gitmo. Now on to this week’s list of the best links on creativity and writing I tweeted and shared on Facebook this week.

CREATIVITY

WRITING

I’d like to look online for tips on how to get Mr. Bacon to behave, but I’m afraid of what might appear if I use the search terms I’ve come up with, like “beating your bacon.” Any advice you have on pork discipline is welcome.


Putting Creatives in a Box

Left-brain, right-brain. Introvert, extrovert. Soloist, collaborator. The literature on creativity is rife with categories. Call me allergic to categorization, after spending the last quarter-century resisting that fate here in Washington, D.C., where it’s assumed everyone has some sort of label that defines you. (Sorry, I don’t.)

My goodness was it muggy when I passed through Charleston, South Carolina, in August of last year. Safe bets? Summer in the Low Country will be damp. We homo sapiens will categorize each other.

I interviewed several dozen creatives on a cross-country U.S. road trip last year, and have had lengthy discussions on the creative process with hundreds more in my professional life. Creatives, in my mind, defy categorization.

The creative process by definition defies categorization, because it thrives on unconventional thinking.

This mini-rant is inspired by a blog post I read recently, “There are 2 Types of Creatives (Which are You?)” by Keith Jennings. (The headline is brilliant; it encourages us to reflect on our favorite subject, ourselves.) The writer does make some effort to indicate his two categories are not black and white. And I mean no disrespect to him in my critique of his thesis. I disagree, however, that at their core creatives are either planners or improvisers.

This is hardly a new analysis, although the terms the writer uses — “causal creative” and “effectual creative” — are new to me. And there is no doubt that most creatives lean one way or the other when they begin a creative project.

I begin as a planner. I have spent the last two weeks working out a 17-page outline for a book I’m writing, and I’ve shared my somewhat anal predilection for white boards.

By contrast, earlier this year I took a class on memoir-writing and one of the students who wanted to write about her experience on a grand jury asked the instructor if it was okay to start writing without any idea what she was going to write. But you’ve already lived it! I thought. How can you not know how it’s going to end?

After an hour of rain, this was the parking lot that awaited me when I arrived at my motel. When I informed the woman at the registration desk that a lake had formed outside her front doors, she shrugged and said, "Welcome to the Low Country."

Easy. For her, the creative process involves following her muse rather than an outline. The process of writing will help her discover what it is she really wants to say. If she boxes herself in now with a specific goal she fears she’ll fall short of what her heart and her muse can create. And she just might.

So far the blog-post writer seems to be on to something. I would take this quiz and be a “causal creative,” i.e., pursuing a CAUSE. And my former classmate would be an “effectual creative,” pursuing an EFFECT.

BUT.

I may have just created a 17-page outline, but that is not a 350-page book. It is, instead, a security blanket. It allows me to sit down at the keyboard, look at the outline to my left, and know on a broad scale what I’m about to write in that session. But it does not keep me from following my muse wherever she may lead me. Just like the student I described above, I openly admit to not being sure exactly where my creative journey each day will take me. I am always open to creative possibility, and do not fear going “off-outline” if I see a vein of precious metal that veers away from the part of the mine I’ve already surveyed.

Here’s evidence of that: Back in March, three months before I began my MFA, I wrote a 15-page outline for this book. The learning and instruction and coaching I’ve enjoyed in the last few months in my MFA has opened my eyes to the possibility of a far better book than I had envisioned. As a result, I have completely overhauled my outline, with very little of the original remaining.

And as for that student focused on effect, not cause, that is a mischaracterization as well. She knows she wants to write a memoir. (CAUSE) She signed up for a memoir-writing class. (CAUSE) She’s inquiring as to possible approaches for writing the memoir. (CAUSE) And she has narrowed down the focus of her memoir to her months trapped in a grand jury room. (CAUSE)

I maintain that all creatives have some CAUSE in mind, even if it is quite broad, even if it is just an aspiration for creative success. And I maintain all creatives embrace EFFECT, welcome spontaneity, even if it just means letting their subconscious have a seat next to them at the keyboard or easel.

Am I nuts here? Does your creative process involve both CAUSE and EFFECT?


Creativity Tweets of the Week – 9/9/11

Is there an air freshener on the market powerful enough to change the fact that my neighborhood smells like a wet dog? In the last four days we here in the D.C. area have received rainfall that would cause Noah to wet his pants. I’m not sure I experienced that much rain cumulatively in my entire childhood in the Arizona desert. I’ve managed to dry off enough to compile below some of the best links on creativity and writing I tweeted this week.

CREATIVITY

WRITING

In the last month my region has had an earthquake and two tropical storms. All I ask is that I be given a heads-up when the locusts are on their way. When they come, is there anyone out there not living under biblical siege who would let me crash on their couch?


Is it Wrong to Imagine Success?

Do you dream of seeing your novel or nonfiction book climb the bestseller charts? Could that dream be hindering your ability to focus on your writing RIGHT NOW?

That question was triggered by blogger Nina Badzin in her most recent post. A number of us bloggers have spent the last couple of weeks writing about the temptation of social media vs. the need to write, and Nina’s new conclusion was this: “I believe the cause of our new-found apathy is our premature worry about our finished products.” (Boldface in original)

Like any artist, Nina has set high goals for herself, and tells herself she’ll meet them. Like any professional, she studies her field, and has learned the odds she faces. She’s read the stories of other’s paths. She’s experienced setbacks. And she wonders if the reason she produces fewer pages now than she once did is because she has a greater sense of how difficult it will be to become a published author.

Is your blogger hard at work on his creative writing? Is he reading his tweets? Is he imagining a midnight queue of pajama-clad bibliophiles camping out to buy his first book on its release date? Has he taken his meds?

Like Nina, I have “finished” manuscripts that are unpublished and I’m sure will remain that way. Like Nina, I’ve studied the industry and know the odds. But for me at least I still think there’s a place for embracing the fantasy.

When I traveled the country talking with artists about creativity, the left brain-right brain dichotomy came up a lot. Some of the artists were highly successful, others still earning most of their income from non-arts jobs. But a core lesson emerged on how driven artists think.

It’s our practical left brains that read Writer’s Digest and Publisher’s Weekly, that follow literary agents on Twitter, that calculate the possible return on investment of every hour spent on our art. But it’s our right brains that make us feel alive, that put aside distraction to enter another world, that worry not about RoI. A true artist embraces both brains.

Listen to the left brain and pay the power bill so you can plug in your computer. But indulge your right brain and allow that part of you to engage in flights of fancy, whether it’s imagining a book signing in your favorite bookstore or sitting in the guest chair on The Colbert Report. Your left brain will tell you not to have those fantasies, that they’re impractical, that they’re setting you up for failure. But your right brain needs those fantasies. It operates by working in a place of imagination, not reality. It’s fuel is make-believe, so let it pretend, let it imagine the best possible outcome that could come from the labor it is providing you in producing your art.

In short, allow yourself to daydream. Give yourself permission to say you’ll be that one writer who gets a big, early break. There will be time to be practical, but an art-committed life requires indulging both reality and fantasy.

When you find yourself discouraged with your art, do you feel guilty for imagining great success for yourself? Do you find you were more productive with your art before you knew the odds you faced professionally? Do you see separate roles in your artistic life for your left brain and right brain? What is your dream? I’d love to hear your thoughts.


Creativity Tweets of the Week — 9/2/11

Before I get to this week’s list of links on creativity and writing I shared on Twitter and Facebook this week, let me request some advice on how to keep a tight leash on my new ward, Mr. Bacon. Days after I introduced him to the world he scampers off to the Milliver’s Travels web site. Did he ask me? No. He’s on a path to stardom, and he’s already forgotten that I gave him his big break. Sigh.

CREATIVITY

WRITING

  • Steve Jobs, Inspiration and Why I Write,” Kate Arms-Roberts: One of my favorite writers is back from hiatus. With all of the digital trees killed this week to (rightly) honor a true innovator, this is a very personal and moving one, worthy of any amount of pixel-slaying. (Related: A Shooting Star, or the Story of a Life)
  • Mr. Bacon makes a break for freedom, hoping to lose himself in the forest. Fortunately his legs are quite short, making him an easy catch.

    Schtick Lit,” Kelly Kathleen Ferguson, Hunger Mountain: Given the focus of my WIP can be described as “humorous creative nonfiction,” I was pleased to come across this post about an author with a similar project who realized she was writing “immersion memoir,” or ‘schtick lit.” Like me, her narrative is built around a road trip, but she introduced her “schtick” by dressing on the trip as Laura Ingalls Wilder. (Related: Starting Down the Road)

  • 7 Deadly Sins of Freelance Writing,” Susan Johnston, The Urban Muse: See how she frames a writing error around the word “lust.” (Related: 7 Steps to Writing Success)
  • The Real Story Behind Low-Residency MFAs,” David Jauss, 36 College Street: The VCFA Blog: This is a strong case for pursuing your MFA in a low-res format. The author does have a bias, being a faculty member with the Vermont College of Fine Arts low-res program, and I have a bias in posting this, being a student in that program. (Related: Sharing Without Fear)

Finally, a big thank you to fellow blogger Melissa Crytzer Fry, who after reading my recent post about going off the grid shared with me four other interesting posts in which writers explore the challenge of finding balance with social media, creative time and life obligations. I strongly recommend these posts by Nina Badzin, Cynthia Robertson, Natalia Sylvester and Julia Munroe Martin.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 348 other followers